/int/ - International

Based.

>>30548 You're either disingenuous or autistic if you deny the pedosexual footfag vibes of Bouguereaus kiddy paintings. Well deserved ban for having shite taste in art, at least.

>>30553 >the pedosexual footfag vibes of Bouguereaus kiddy paintings You're just as mentally ill as actual pedos.

>>30553 >>30554 I rate the Swiss is joking and funny. The German, I'm not sure either if just autistic.

Must be hell to moderate.

I love spotted hyenas too much but thanks god that isnt illegal.

I think most women peak at 19 but it depends

Thanks, this is why I now completely stopped not just posting, but now even browsing Kohlchan since I've found this place :3

>>30595 sames I removed the bookmark a couple of weeks back

tho we should raid them every now and then and bring over any remaining true-bernds

>>30605 I think the good Bernds will come on their own like they did so far. A raid might invite the ones we'd rather keep out.

>>30607 I think quite some people are here due to innocent rangebans so trust the rangebans. t. In colon gypsy rangeban since september

The Bosnian pedo still isn’t banned… what the fuck is the admin doing?

>>30560 Hyenas will be officially illegal in Australia from 1 January 2026 so be careful

>>30631 There arent even any in Austria cause the shitstain Tierpark Schönbrunn considers them to be too inferior to keep them. Worst zoo in europe.

>>30560 The fuck?

>>30634 Hyenas are docile towards humans. Even wild ones. Shouldnt surprise you.

>>30627 I got banned for this post >>/m/1571, mods can't detect sarcasm :-D

>>30635 I bet they smell really bad.

>>30643 Try linking it again, I can't find it, you have to use three >

>>30647 ah fug, >>>/m/1571 But I got unbanned quickly, thanks modderinos

>>30648 Ah, I can't even see your post in the thread (only in preview), because I blocked the OP country, those uBlock filters are pure bliss.

>>30605 I think recruitment should happen elsewhere too. Kohl was a no-go for me from the start due to the pedo stuff and generally attracting the worst posters so I had to be told about this place elsewhere. Maybe we need to make our own hot-new memes by capturing a Finnish poster.

>>30661 Recruitment? This is an Internet forum, people will find it if they feel the need for it. There’s no need to advertise it anywhere.

>>30662 That's not how it works anymore, I think.

>>30545 >>30544 Discussions should be fine, there is literally no harm in that and free speech should be able to accomodate this. But for the love of the Buttergott, hammer out every instance of underage pictures, even if its dressed ones. That is the biggest attractor for nonces.

>>30667 I'd happily remove discussions on the topic as well. They do nothing but attract the wrong crowd, even if started in good faith.

>>30662 It'll require advertisement in some form. I'm only here because someone posted a thread on kohl

>>30673 Fair point of view. I'd keep them around because there are preciously view places where people can talk in text about any topic they want and also because there is a bit of a screeching craze going around where people scream "Pedo!" when a 19 year old woman gets courted by a 24 year old guy. But i am also pretty big freedom of speech (as long as its not directly about planning hard criminal activities) advocat and thats a stance that requires quite a bit of extra work from admins/mods to not get out of hand.

>>30674 >It'll require advertisement in some form. True >advertisting on kohl Too many genuinly mentally insane people over there, I'd rather not see here.

Hey, guys, where do I apply for the job of moderator of Krautchan.org?

>>30688 first take that stupid hat off

>>30676 > i am also pretty big freedom of speech So, you're a big freedom of speech? Like you really want to hear the concerns of women, browns, leftists (etc.) in serious discussions?

>>30689 I actually like it, it's unique. It's like I'm different from the rest.

>>30692 Yes, it is important that anyone is able to talk. Nobody is forcing you to listen. I wouldn't listen to a gynobot either, but somebody else might want to and it's not my business to stifle that.

>>30701 Case in point, look at Kohl or reddit for what happens if somebody arbitrarily decides whom shall be able to talk and who shan't.

>>30702 If nobody arbitrarily decides what is spam and what is not, there is also no discussion, just noise. Isn't reddit working fine enough for leftists? Or crystal café for females? Free speech is a code word for spam and destruction.

>>30703 >If nobody arbitrarily decides what is spam and what is not, there is also no discussion, just noise Decisions must be made, but that doesn't mean they shall be made arbitrarily. If you have no coherency in decision making, you end up with some disgusting nepotist cesspool >Isn't reddit working fine enough for leftists Not really, it's a perfect example of skewing to more and more extreme moderation >Free speech is a code word for spam and destruction Wrong You are confusing content with way of delivering That being said, "leftism" is such a retarded category, it throws any pretext about it not being more than "don't post what I don't like" out of the window.

>>30706 >You are confusing content with way of delivering >That being said, "leftism" is such a retarded category, The leftists (you're an anarchist BTW?) don't realize it themselves that they are posting unwanted and stupid spam, they think they are fine and it's the "nazis" who are stupid. It's partly a matter of good intentions, education and critical thinking. Like, let's suppose you're an anarchist pedo, you want to post your shit, others don't want it, and then you post about your way of understanding freespeech, maybe convinced in your heart that you are fighting for freedom, euqality and free-speech, regardless if free-speech, equality and freedom are actually stupid ideas.

>>30711 >You are Maybe a national-liberal with a social (not socialist) streak? >>30711 >you want to post your shit, others don't want it Can be applied to literally anything. I don't want hear about nonces crying they should be allowed to diddle 8 year olds, I don't want to hear about chuds whining about not getting a GF, I don't want to listen to kikes screeching how they are the victim and I sure as hell don't want to listen to the ramblings of feminists. At the same time, there are surely others who don't want to listen about my judeorealism, my interest in castles or general nerd stuff. If you don't want your own free speech denied by arbitrary asspulls ("oooy vey!") this right needs to be universal. And again, content and frequency as well as way of delivery are two different things. If you shit up the board with the same topic three times a day, it's spam, no matter how much I like or dislike the content. And on the same matter, if you make a new thread on a topic that hasn't had a thread in days, it's not spam, even if it's something I think abhorrent like gynocratic ramblings. Same goes for low effort Twittercopypasta threads. It literally doesn't matter whats the content, it's a shit thread. And it's something that's absolutely not restricted to "leftist" posting. Kohl/b was for a while completely full with it until a mod got fed up with that bullshit and started removing it, even though the content was mostly regarding criminal migrants and assorted topics.

>>30713 I replied to some points in the post but I don't think this discussions matters: >If you don't want your own free speech denied by arbitrary asspulls ("oooy vey!") this right needs to be universal. No, they don't. You referring to a theory by Kant which was made to simplify the reasoning about moral rules. It's far from the be-all/end-all of morality, actually it's used as a tool to destroy morality, some examples: -"you want to live in your country in peace, funny because some gypsies also want that" -"males and females can marry, why not the gays and lesbians too?" -"you want to post about religion, better accept the evangelist posting from the old testament" >it's not spam, even if it's something I think abhorrent like gynocratic ramblings. I disagree about this too, spam is not just about frequency, it's the useless shit you don't want, even if it's once a month as a monthly reminder that "women have a lower salary" for isntance. >It literally doesn't matter whats the content, it's a shit thread I also don't like this. I don't use that site. Except I think that it can happen that something posted on that site could be a relevant and good pic to start a discussion.

Administrator! I am discontented! For some reason I was banned for being a Pedo when I am no such thing and I never posted anything that would say that I was nor did I ever advocate for it, in fact I don't even know what post I was banned for and I have appealed but I am still banned. Very sad!!!

Never put .org on https://allchans.org/ .rip did and that’s probably the list the pedo bots use. https://krautchan.rip/ban/350796 https://trashchan.xyz/meta/thread/374.html Try to say clear of any list of Chans. https://imageboards.net/search Seems to be fine at the moment.

Based

>>30715 The thread is available in /m/ if you want to see why I thought you were part of the apologists. I approved your appeal btw. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Non-pedos are welcome here, of course.

>>30725 Okay.

>>30717 wow this makes so much sense! I frequent a few textboards and they regularly get spam posts for advertising CP. they probably just crawl one of these lists, because seceral for old school text boards exist. It's sad because these boards are very slow (like 2 posts a week maybe) and adminds don't check regularly so these trash posts can stay up for hours

>>30667 would be wise to ban the discussion as well for a while, unless you want to patrol the board regularly you can still relax that in the long term

Have you ever smelled wild foxes? Thats even worse.